Showing posts with label care crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label care crisis. Show all posts

Friday, March 27, 2009

Parsons uses FOI to obtain information - Chatham Daily News - Ontario, CA

http://www.chathamdailynews.ca/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1497544

Parsons uses FOI to obtain information Posted By ERICA BAJER, THE DAILY
NEWS

A Wallaceburg councillor is using the province's Freedom of Information
legislation to try and access a report on the physical condition of the
Sydenham hospital.

Sheldon Parsons handed an FOI request to Erie St. Clair Local Health
Integration Network CEO Gary Switzer yesterday.

Switzer said the LHIN doesn't have a copy of the 2005 infrastructure
study compiled by Stantec Consulting. However, he plans to forward the
FOI request to the Ministry of Health and Long-term Care.

Parsons didn't hand CKHA the FOI request, because hospitals are exempt
from the legislation.

"We believe that you have the authority to get it," Parsons told
Switzer. "We believe it was used as background data for the Hay report."


The councillor said Chatham- Kent Health Alliance has denied requests
from the Save Our Sydenham committee to hand over the full report.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

People are fighting to save their care system -Chatham-Kent

SOS seeks full report

HEALTH CARE: Wants report before Friday's meeting

Posted By TREVOR TERFLOTH, THE DAILY NEWS

Save Our Sydenham members want the full story on the physical condition of the Wallaceburg hospital.

The group requested a 2005 infrastructure study commissioned by the Chatham-Kent Health Alliance from Stantec Consulting.

However, CKHA CEO Ken Tremblay had denied the full report to SOS, saying a Powerpoint summary was already given to them.

SOS chairman Jeff Wesley said the group needs the information to prepare for Friday's public meeting with the Erie St. Clair Local Health Integration Network in Wallaceburg.

"We're a grassroots organization. We don't have paid staff," he said. "They've asked us for solutions -- we want to give them solutions."

Earlier this year, the LHIN received a report that recommended the closure of the Sydenham Campus emergency department.

Wallaceburg Coun. Sheldon Parsons criticized Tremblay and the hospital on the council floor during Monday's meeting, saying SOS deserved to have the Stantec information.

Yesterday, Parsons said it was his understanding that one copy of the report would be released to Rob Browning, the municipality's chief administrative officer.

As of yesterday afternoon, the councillor was still waiting for the report. He was unsure of the timeframe for its release.

"They've authorized a copy," Parsons said. "I'm going to be allowed to look at it."

Tremblay couldn't be reached for immediate comment.

 four-year-old Stantec report, but hadn't seen it personally.

He gave an update on the emergency department issue at the LHIN board yesterday and said the public is providing much feedback.

Some concerns raised include rural availability of care, patient transportation and travel time.

"They're very, very valid concerns," Ganter said.

The Hay Group had recommended the Sydenham Campus become an urgent-care centre.

Ganter said the LHIN is still collecting information and also speaking with officials from such a facility in British Columbia.

"We want to understand what the pros and cons are," he said.

Friday's community meeting will take place at 7 p. m. at Wallaceburg District Secondary School.

Presentations will be made and the community will have the opportunity to share their views about the Hay Group's report.

"Comment - good for the SOS citizen group for trying to get an accounting of their public money and save their hospital and care system . The customer is King- it is good to see a demonstration of this new principle. Don't except the standard excuses for bad service or bad public decisions " Q-J

--

Monday, March 23, 2009

How to turn the tables on taxpayer ripoffs in self defense

Canadian Healthcare -a free service or ride for whom?

How do we turn the tables on America's ultimate rip-off (the HEALTHCARE SYSTEM) and get real results-better medical care and put thousands of extra dollars in your pocket each year by reducing unnecessary public health spending.

There's no question that the healthcare industry is Canada's biggest rip-off. As a professional caregiver with a dozen years inside this industry, I've seen things that would make your head spin.

The healthcare system is primarily set up to benefit the drug companies- the insurance companies- and the countless middlemen who have weaseled their way into the system. It is a big business where the customer is manipulated for special agendas that have little to do with providing good , timely, cost effective care to those that need the health service

A report by the independent consultancy firm, Milliman & Robertson, Inc., reports that as many as 60% of all surgeries performed in the U.S. are unnecessary. Did you know, for example, that in one recent year, according to the nonprofit group Public Citizen, the top 10 pharmaceutical companies in the Fortune 500 had higher profits than the other 490 companies (from all the other industries) combined!

· Kickbacks and referral fees are common .The practice for illegally marketing drugs, for ailments they never even meant to treat is common.

o It is common to prescribe drugs and tests that were absolutely worthless

· I've seen older folks literally die because of incompetent medical treatment

· I've seen insurance companies cheat policyholders

· I've seen the Ministry of Health cheat policyholders and taxpayers by denying service, denying care service in a timely manner, and promoting higher cost products and services at the expense of lower cost better care alternatives

· I’ve seen regulated or “over regulated “care in its worse case nightmare scenario

o Over inflated health cost paid or 'over paid' by the taxpayer

§ 28$ /km legislated transportation costs

§ 1500 $/day shared room rates

§ Obscene drug charges- 1700$ plus for drops of medicine administered in less then 5 minutes

The list goes on and on. That's incredible, isn't it? This is not a pretty reality picture nor the public spin and information regularly promoted by the people who have a hand in your care pocket and are feeding from the public trough. It is time to realize that if you are an American or Canadian over the age of 40, you are almost certainly being ripped off by the healthcare system.

I'm here to tell you today that you don't have to take it anymore. Get involved and take your care system back and reduce the waste of this critical industry.

What are today‘s common taxpayer rip-offs and beefs?

Rip-off one -Healthcare

Last year Canadians spent $172 billion a year on health care, up from $79 billion in 1997. What accounts for these increases in spending and how can Canadians receive better value for their Healthcare dollars? Did you know that the average annual health cost for a average family of three is estimated to be $18, 000. Or that the average cost of common drugs is:

§ Cancer – 80K? Sight - 15 K? Other -?

A system that instead of just foolishly risking people’s money also risks peoples lives

Rip-off two- Cost of ownership increasing

Real estate prices are dropping but real estate taxes are sky rocketing and costs of ownership are increasing –with new ridiculous regulated fees, higher energy costs, higher finance charges.

Rip-off three- Government administration cost waste

You overpay your taxes to the most wasteful multi-tiered government in the world. Thousands of dollars could be saved with a wiser use of resources

Rip-off four- Government self-entitlement programs

The financial markets are down by 50% over last year. Yet government entitlement programs, bonuses pay millions to administrators, and government employees at the expense of the existing competitive market reality. A market corruption factor that must be addressed.

Do something about it – be heard

If you are sick of the waste, the endless self serving talk, if you believe that institutions (such as government , finance, health just to name a few) should be accountable to you - the customers on main street, you must do something about it.

If you are tired of getting ripped off by the institutions that are supposedly there to serve you but don’t or are tired of watching the government flush away the value of your savings and assets ……. and if you are tired of everyone trying to get their hands on your money, by proclaiming to do so “in your best interests” you should do something about it

If you are tired of the hypocrisy, greed and want to re-build the respect and a return to fairness in our institutions -you should promote and stand for basic operating principles and common sense

Join the Taxpayers Coalitions

– we care as you do in the wise use of our resources –

contact respondfeedbacknow@yahoo.ca

Friday, March 20, 2009

Patient transfer a $700 regulated waste of limited resources?

A discusting waste exposed by Christina Blizzard

Patient transfers an area for savings

A recently released study on ambulance transfers provides an interesting glimpse into a shocking hidden cost of health care.

Fully-equipped ambulances, staffed by trained EMS paramedics, are increasingly being used as an expensive form of health buses to transport patients to non-urgent care.

That's according to a study by University of Toronto researchers, who found that of the approximately 400,000 patient transfers each year, just over 80% are non-urgent, routine patient transfers.

"Primarily, these are for physician appointments, dialysis or returning to the facility they came from or home," said lead researcher Victoria Robinson in an interview.

Large urban areas can sometimes control transfer costs by using private transportation companies.

Those simply don't exist everywhere, so smaller towns and cities, northern and rural areas depend on ambulances for transfers.

"This practice diverts resources from more emergent requests," the study finds.

One of the outcomes of hospital restructuring that occurred in the 1990s is that patients no longer get one-stop shopping when they're hospitalized. One in three patients admitted to hospital has to be transferred elsewhere for treatment.

"Every day in Ontario there are approximately 3,000 hospital admissions. It is now up to 1,375 patient transfers," Robinson said. She estimates the average cost of a transfer at a staggering $700.

Patient transfers overall are costing the health-care system more than $280 million annually.

"The results call into question the use of sophisticated, highly-trained, expensive patient transfer resources to provide routine medical services in Ontario," says the report.

EMS service is provincially mandated and regulated, but is administered locally.


The researchers were able to track statistics because of changes to the transfer system that happened during the SARS outbreak of 2003. In the GTA, SARS was in part transmitted by inter-facility patient transfer.

During SARS, the old way of one hospital calling another to set up a transfer ended and a new system that screens for infectious diseases was implemented. No transfer can take place without authorization. A transfer often occurs when a patient arrives at an ER suffering from a condition that hospital isn't equipped to handle. Or, frequently, patients are transferred between hospitals for services such as dialysis -- often as many as three times a week.

While 70% of all transfers are within a 25-kilometre distance, some are longer. Those involving pregnant women and newborn babies require travelling a median of 40.3 km for re.

"The problems with transfers in general is that they are lower priority," Robinson said.

"A 911 call will always take priority.

"An emergency transfer is going to take priority over a non-urgent transfer, and a non-urgent transfer could be that dialysis appointment.

"Even though that is non-urgent, to that patient, they have to get that care and if it is delayed it's going to have an impact on their care," she said.

Clearly any system that is costing taxpayers $700 for patient transportation that could easily be handled by a taxi is unsustainable.

Let's see now: An average trip of 25 km costs us around $700. That works out to around $28 per km. At least you don't have to tip the paramedics.

Still, there has to be a cheaper and more effective way.

As health care becomes more regionalized and hospitals start to specialize in cancer care, cardiac, pediatric care and so on, this province will have to find a cheaper, more sensible way to move patients around.



Health spending watch group
backtoeden.ontario@gmail.com
http://www.backtoeden.bravehost.com/
"Building elder peer communities that are cozy,caring and comfortable" -quality 24/7 care

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Where is the most government control - Communist China or the USA?

An interesting - and hilarious - take on China/U.S. relations Tuesday, March 17, 2009 from the S&A Digest:

Today the federal budget accounts for nearly 30% of GDP - the most since WWII. Add in the highly regulated and highly subsidized health care industry and you've got the government in control of nearly half the economy. Now add in the banking system - which couldn't exist without the FDIC, which would already be insolvent without the backing of Congress. Now add in the insurance industry, which will surely collapse next. Now add in all the state governments' spending and employees.
Most Americans don't understand: The government is now running most of the economy, by a wide margin. And who keeps the government afloat? The Chinese.
Think about that for a little while... The so-called "Communist" Chinese, whose government makes up about 10% of China's GDP and who control the No. 1 freest city in the world (Hong Kong), are now paying for the most government-controlled economy in the world - the so-called "land of the free."

Central planning did not work in the USSR- the top down management and funding from the central committee model was flawed because it did not provide products and services to diverse market segments or the grassroots effectively. Competition, and more de-centralized market choice improved conditions in Russia. Is there a lesson here for the entrenched Ministry of Health and Long Term planning -an organization that dictates market conditions and is a protected public health service monopoly? QJ

Sunday, March 01, 2009

Unsustainable Healthcare System Needs Better Value for Money

This is self explainatory -Unsustainable Healthcare System Needs Better Value for Money . Get involved fill out the questionare -QJ

Last year Canadians spent $172 billion a year on health care, up from $79 billion in 1997. What accounts for these increases in spending and how can Canadians receive better value for their Healthcare dollars? That’s a question the Health Council of Canada will be asking Canadians as it launches its Value for Money consultation. The new website, http://www.CanadaValuesHealth.ca
allows Canadians to engage in discussions via blogs, comments and surveys. The Council has published a background paper entitled Value for Money: Making Canadian Health Care Stronger

It’s clear that maintaining the status quo is not an option. Recent reports indicate that we can’t keep allocating a larger and larger share of our budget to health care in order to buy marginal improvements in the system. Those dollars are diverted from other budgets that also contribute to health outcomes. In other words, we run the risk of making society sicker by draining other public spending budgets. And what’s worse, in a recent Frontier Centre for Public Policy/Health Consumer Powerhouse report that evaluated countries from a patient perspective, Canada was ranked last in return on investment. When compared to 29 European countries, we got the least bang for our buck.

“The proposal to assess Value for Money in the Canadian health care system could not have come at a better time. During an economic downturn, escalating health care costs can exert the wrong kind of political pressure – cutbacks or privatization.” Said Susan Eng, CARP VP, Advocacy.

Whereas part of the solution will be to tap into the estimated 30% waste in the system, the discussion will also involve values, and maybe even challenge our assumptions. As Canadians, we are generally very proud of our universal healthcare system, which we consider to be vastly superior to the American for-profit model. But are these really the only terms of the debate? We might perhaps look to some of the more successful European models and see where they have produced better health outcomes. We might also highlight the importance of accountability: when setting benchmarks we also need to consider indicators, measures, and consequences if healthcare goals are not met.

What the Health Council’s report clarifies is that the aging population is not the main cause of ballooning health care costs. Let us dispel this myth once and for all with a breakdown of the numbers: a rise in the use of procedures and services accounts for 48% of spending increases, inflation places second at 27%, population growth accounts for 14% and longer life spans only 11%.
The Health Council is set to report on the results of its facilitated discussion in a few months. “The objective of this consultation isn’t to tell health professionals how to do their job: it’s to design a more coordinated and efficient health care system that embraces what we will collectively define as being of value in health care,” said Eng. Don’t forget to have your say by filling out the CARP E-healthVFM/ Survey
and by visiting the Health Council website at http://www.CanadaValuesHealth.ca


Click here
for an executive summary of the Frontier Centre for Public Policy/Health Consumer Powerhouse Euro-Canadian Healthcare Index report.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Nurse practitioners to head 3 new Ontario clinics

An excellent use of existing skill to solve patient problems and destream the medical gridlock and increase medical capacity - QJ

Nurse Practitioners a solution

Nurse practitioners in Ontario can treat common illnesses and injuries, and order diagnostic tests. (CBC)The Ontario government is going ahead with three new clinics headed by nurse-practitioners, the first of 25 set to open by 2012.

The clinics will focus on primary care, including chronic disease management and health promotion, the Ministry of Health said Friday.

They are intended to fill gaps in primary care, especially the shortage of family doctors.

"Today’s announcement is the answer thousands of people have been waiting for," Wendy Fucile, president of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, said in a comment posted on the ministry's website.

Nurse practitioners are registered nurses with additional education in health assessment, diagnosis and management of illnesses and injuries.

As well as treating common ailments and injuries, they can order lab tests, X-rays and other diagnostic procedures.

Ontario’s first nurse practitioner-led clinic, which opened in Sudbury in 2007, provides health care to about 2,000 patients, the ministry said. Nurse practitioners are increasingly popular, but still represent a tiny proportion of the nearly 258,000 registered nurses in Canada, the Canadian Institute of Health Information reported in 2007.http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/02/20/nurse-practitioner.html?ref=rss

Between 2003 and 2007, the number of licensed nurse practitioners almost doubled to 1,346, the institute said. Every territory and province except the Yukon Territory had licensed nurse practitioner programs in 2007, it said.

The three new clinics in Ontario will be opened in Belle River, about 30 kilometres east of Windsor, Sault Ste. Marie and Thunder Bay.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Cleared of wrongdoing, cancer expert calls for inquiry

more injustice- Interesting that the system can take such a long time to right a wrong- an inquery is in order so that others do not have to endure the same qj


Last Updated: Friday, February 13, 2009 | 10:23 AM ET
CBC News
A Halifax doctor wrongfully accused of endangering patients is calling for a public inquiry into his 6½-year suspension from practising cancer medicine.

A review board recently cleared Dr. Michael Goodyear of all allegations of wrongdoing.

"The old saying in life is you can't fight city hall. But occasionally Erin Brockovichs come along, and they do," Goodyear told CBC News in his first interview since his vindication.

In 2002, Goodyear was treating cancer patients at the QEII Health Sciences Centre and was a researcher at Dalhousie medical school when a colleague complained about his choice of drugs and therapies.

Goodyear's supervisor filed an official complaint with the hospital, claiming Goodyear was endangering the safety of his patients. The hospital suspended his privileges pending an investigation.

That investigation process was supposed to take 40 days. Instead, it lasted 6½ years.

Goodyear was allowed to keep teaching at Dalhousie, but it was only a fraction of his former duties. His financial problems grew over the years. His house is under the control of a bankruptcy trustee and he sometimes wears hand-me-down clothes from former patients.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Rural Care Crisis

What are the alternatives? better cost effective delivery systems maybe QJ

Forced to close; Newbury hospital loses outpatient physiotherapy
Posted By CHIP MARTIN

In a move called devastating to its local community, one of Ontario's smallest hospitals is being forced to close its outpatient physiotherapy program to balance its budget.
That means many of the 23,000 rural, small-town and elderly residents served by Four Counties Health Services in Newbury will have to travel farther and pay from their own pockets to replace the service. Or do without.

"This will have a huge impact," said Yvonne Lambert, board chairperson of the Middlesex Hospital Alliance that operates the 16-bed facility in Newbury. The physiotherapy service is slated to end Sept. 1.
"These are retired people, farmers and small businesspersons and less than a quarter of them have private (health) coverage" to cover the cost of private clinics. And the closest private clinic is 35 minutes away.
The announcement comes on the eve of today's provincial budget, expected to have little new money for health care.
New funding is unlikely despite hospital bed shortages across the London region and elsewhere because of a shortage of long-term and chronic-care beds.
For the Four Counties area, there's a slim chance residents will find replacement service at a hospital in Chatham covered by government health care, Lambert said. Private clinics are more likely.
Lambert said to balance its $10-million operating budget, Four Counties has had to chop $500,000, of which $300,000 is the 38-year-old outpatient clinic with three physiotherapists, an assistant and a manager shared with Strathroy-Middlesex hospital. The clinic had 6,350 outpatient visits last year.
"In a small hospital it is very hard to cut anything," Lambert said. She said talks about the situation continue with the Southwest Local Health Integration Network.
Monte McNaughton, a Newbury businessperson, described the closing as "devastating for patients, for the local economy and health care in Ontario."
McNaughton, a board member who ran for the Progressive Conservatives against local Liberal MPP Maria Van Bommel (Lambton-Kent-Middlesex), said provincial Liberals will buy 22 Made-in-Scotland buses for Toronto but won't support health care for local residents.
Advertisement

"It just doesn't make sense and is a further slap in the face to our rural communities," he said.
Conservative health critic Elizabeth Witmer said the Four Counties situation "is happening across the province."
She said termination of services "has a very negative impact on people" and the government should allow private delivery of health care covered by government insurance.